Designing of social and labor relations in the context of transformation: principles, organizational and institutional aspects

  • Elena Yurevna Legchilina Omsk State Transport University, Department "Management, marketing and commerce". Omsk, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9091-0600
Palabras clave: Labor relations; transformation of labor relations; principles of labor relations designing; organizational and institutional aspects.

Resumen

The paper studies the organizational and institutional problems in the field of labor relations transformation and substantiates novel principles of their designing aimed at achieving the balance between the interests of the parties. 

 We used a system-axiological approach based on a combination of analytical, institutional and systemic methods. The concept of co-evolution was applied while considering organizational and institutional aspects of social and labor relations.

The study proposes axiological dialectics as a systemic and meaning-forming factor in the transformation of labor relations. The author understands the transformation of labor relations as a construction of their novel organizational and inter-organizational structure intended to ensure the long-term functioning and development of the company.

The analysis of organizational and institutional bases of labor relations is carried out and four principles for the construction of labor relations in the transformation state in respect to economic systems are developed. The proposed organizational and institutional methodology and principles for labor relations designing can reduce contradictions in the system of labor relations and help achieve a balance of its participants’ interests. They can also serve as a conceptual basis for building the system of labor relations under transformation, as well as a way to shape the socio-economic development strategy of a company and/or an economic system.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

Elena Yurevna Legchilina, Omsk State Transport University, Department "Management, marketing and commerce". Omsk, Russian Federation

Candidate of economic sciences, associate professor, Omsk State Transport University, head of the Department "Management, marketing and commerce". Omsk, Russian Federation

Citas

A Leader’s Guide to “Always-On” Transformation (2015). Jim Hemerling, Diana Dosik, and Shaheer Rizvi. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/people-organization-leaders-guide-to-always-on-transformation.aspx

Alle M. (1998). Conditions of effectiveness in the economy. M.: Nauka dlya obshchestva.

Belkina N.A. (2011). Labor management by goals and results in the system "Growth". Chelyabinskij gumanitarij. T. 4. № 17. (pр. 24-29).

Cavalcanti, J.S.B, Bendini, M.I. (2014). Globalization and change in labour relations in fruit regions of Brazil and Argentina. Res. Rural Sociol. Dev. V. 20. (pp.3–32).

Chahestani F.J., Fazel A., Mirjafari S. A. (2016). Predictive of organizational efficienc based on the quality of working life and personality traits among employees Hormozgan Province Gas Company. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology. 7(3). (pp. 287-291), http://www.iahrw.com/index.php/home/journal_detail/19#list

Cushen J. (2016). Financialization and value: why labour and the labour process still matter. Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 30(2). (pp. 352-365). /doi/10.1177/0950017015617676

Dolan S., Garsiya S. (2008). Value-based management. M.: Pretekst.

Dolzhenko R. A. (2014). New forms of labor relations: institutionalization and use in an innovative economy. Barnaul: AltGU.

Ehlers L. I. (2017). Conceptualising primary labour relationship quality. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences. V. 20(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v20i1.1573.

Frey C.B., Osborne M.A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 114. (pp. 254–280). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019

Fukuyama F. (1999). The Great Disruption. London: Profile Books.

Gosetti G. (2017). Sustainable Agriculture and Quality of Working Life: Analytical Perspectives and Confirmation from Research. Sustainability, Vol. 9(10). (p. 1749). doi:10.3390/su9101749. http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1749/html.

Helfen M.,  Schüßler Е., Sydow J. (2018). How can employment relations in global value networks be managed towards social responsibility? Human Relations. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0018726718757060.

Howe J. (2016). Labour regulation now and in the future: Current trends and emerging themes. Journal of Industrial Relations. Vol. 59 (2). (pp. 209-224). DOI: 10.1177/0022185616671352.

Isaac J., Cutcher-Gershenfeld J. E. (2018). Creating value and mitigating harm: Assessing institutional objectives in Australian industrial relations. The Economic & Labour Relations Review.

Jackson G., Doellgast V., Baccaro L. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Labour Standards: Bridging Business Management and Employment Relations Perspectives. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56:1 March. (pp. 3–13). doi: 10.1111/bjir.12298.

Joe I. and Joel E. Cutcher-Gershenfeld (2018). Creating value and mitigating harm: Assessing institutional objectives in Australian industrial relations. The Economic & Labour Relations Review. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1035304618767263

Kilhoffer Z., Lenaerts K., Beblavý M. (2017). The Platform Economy and Industrial Relations: Applying the Old Framework to the New Reality (August 7, 2017). CEPS Research Report, N. 2017/12, August. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3053826

Kuz'min A.M., Vysokovskaya E.A. (2012). Management by objectives. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva. No 3. (pр. 11).

Lanchenko Y.O. (2018). Мethodical bases of economic analysis of social and labour relations development in agriculture. Економічний вісник університету. № 37(1). (pp.177-184). https://economic-bulletin.com/index.php/journal/article/view/27

Legchilina E. (2017). Transformation of social and labor relations at the stages of the life cycle of economic systems. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya. V. 10(3). (pр. 600-604).

Lewin A.Y., Volberda H.W. (1999). Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science. V. 10(5). (pp. 519-534). DOI: 10.1287/orsc.10.5.519

Magun V.S., Rudnev M.G. (2010). Basic values of Russians and other Europeans. Voprosy ehkonomiki. No 12. (pр. 93–102). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/PET1061-1991541003

McGrath-Champ S., Rainnie Al, Pickren G., Herod A. (2015). Global destruction networks, the labour process and employment relations. Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 57(4), (pp. 624–640). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185615582241

Nazarova U. A, Galimova A. S., Galina A.E. (2018). Transformation of Labour and Labour Values: a System of Social-Labour Relations and its System Features. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, V. 47. (pp.1149-1154). https://doi.org/10.2991/iscfec-18.2019.259

Nort D. (1997). Institutional changes: framework for analysis. Voprosy ekonomiki. No 3 (рр. 97–137).

Oleskin A. V. (2013). Network structures in biosystems and human society. M.: Knizhnyj dom «LIBROKOM».

Porter M. E. Kramer M.R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review. 89 (1–2). (pp. 62–77).

Potudanskaya V.F., Mizya M.S. (2016). The efficiency of the personnel of innovation active enterprises: a socio-technological approach. OmGTU. M.: Ekonomika.

Sorgner A., Bode E., Krieger-Boden C. (2017). The Effects of Digitalization on Gender Equality in the G20 Economies. Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.2017. http://www.emsdialogues.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/20170707_W20_Studie_v2.5.pdf

Value measurement of economic and labor activity. Russian modernization. Interdisciplinary approach. (2012) Kollektivnaya monografiya (Pod red. N.V. Rodionovoj). M.: YUNITI-DANA.
Publicado
2020-01-24
Cómo citar
Legchilina, E. (2020). Designing of social and labor relations in the context of transformation: principles, organizational and institutional aspects. Revista Científica Del Amazonas, 3(5), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.34069/RC/2020.5.04
Sección
Articles